Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Ruocco's "State of the Town"

The following is a guest post from Tom Ruocco. It's something that he initially sent to a few constituents in the 2nd District, but I asked him to share it with all of you. So here it is... unedited, except for deleting a few meeting dates that have already passed:

I hope that your holidays were enjoyable and that your New Year's resolutions are in order. I'm sending along this update to remind you of some critical dates, proposals and decisions.

Board of Education Budget
The requested budget is $59,788,292. That's a 7.29% increase from current year; an increase of $4,063,049.

Based on revenue projections for the proposed retail/residential development on the table before the P&Z, it would take 2-3 of these developments just to cover the proposed increase in the BOE budget for this year. That should give you an idea of how little new revenue can help when you have to accommodate spending of this magnitude. Residents are encouraged to attend the BOE meetings and speak up, if possible, about the proposed budget increases.

Fund Balance/Surplus policy
Recently, at the January 11th meeting, the Town Council adopted a new policy that requires the Town to maintain an un-designated fund balance equal to 8 - 9% of the previous year's expenditures. Ultimately, that means that for every dollar in spending, we will have to allocate an additional 8 cents to maintain the fund balance. Looking at the BOE budget alone, we would have to ensure that an additional $325,034 is set aside for undesignated reserves to meet the requirement of the adopted policy. And that's just for the BOE budget. Factor in other departments, and you can see how much we have to hit up the taxpayer to meet the 8% fund balance minimum.

This policy passed 5-4 along party lines. The Democrats voting in favor, the Republicans against. My objection was that the 8% minimum was too high. I proposed an amendment that defined the fund balance as 5-9% instead of the minimum of 8%. I felt it gave us more flexibility and would have actually accommodated the democrats desire for an 8% balance. I thought it was a good compromise, but it failed 5-4, again along party lines (democrats voting against).

The policy also described options for distributing funds which exceed the 8% minimum. Currently, we have about 1.4 million dollars in excess funds, which translates into a current fund balance of about 9.4%. I hope we can dedicate those funds to providing tax relief, but as of now there are no stated plans to do so. We will debate that during the budget deliberations.

Statement to Legislators to improve repeat offender laws
I'm happy to report that my amendment to the annual legislative package was adopted unanimously by the Council. The amendment calls for strengthening our repeat offender laws and defining home invasion as a violent crime. The full adopted text is as follows:

"In light of the deadly home invasion that claimed three Cheshire lives on July 23, 2007, and in the interest of preventing this kind of crime from ever happening again, the Cheshire Town Council urges our state delegation to work toward meaningful criminal justice reform including reforming Connecticut's persistent offender statute, reclassification of home invasion (burglary) as a violent crime, and revamping our current parole system. We urge the legislature to schedule a special session to deal with these important matters as soon as possible and to focus on changes which would have had a major impact on the felons who were responsible for the horrific crime they committed in Cheshire ."
Thank you once again for your attention. Please stay in touch. Be sure to watch the various board meetings on channel 14, and try to attend meetings. There are critical decisions on the table, and they will all affect your daily life in Cheshire

I hope this was of interest to you. My thought is that this is another small step in the right direction... open government. Hopefully over the coming months and years, more elected officials, such as Tom Ruocco, Tim Slocum and Diane Visconti (all guest posters), will take advantage of new media to interact with voters.

Tim White

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Board of Ed's massive spending increases are for the children. End of discussion. Who are you to question how much we spend?

You and Gov. Rell say that increases in property tax (and spending) should be limited to 3% a year, and that tax increases over 3% should have to get voter approval.

Next you’ll say that tax money belongs to taxpayers, and that the School Dept. should have to be careful about spending like everyone else. You're so mean-spirited.

The voters cannot be trusted to make decisions about school spending. We’re the education experts, we know what’s best for the children. So just pay your taxes and shut up. Wunderland, don’t question, be happy.

Anonymous said...

”Based on revenue projections for the proposed retail/residential development… it would take 2-3 of these developments just to cover the proposed increase in the BOE budget for this year”.

And that’s not even including the additional costs of the huge influx of new students from the development into Cheshire schools.

Between the BOE’s net spending increase of 6% annually, the town council’s insistence on fully funding reserves at 8-9%, and the huge influx of new students from the ND... all while we're going into a recession... Cheshire is facing a tidal wave of massive tax increases in the near future. I am truly frightened.

Anonymous said...

The fact that our school enrollment has declined over the past 2 years and we are asking for an increse of this magnitude to me is offensive. Florio has been drinking more than coffee.

Anonymous said...

Be careful, do not attempt to compare % increases, will always lead to inaccurate conclusions. The problem is with declining enrollment the Supt does not want to decrease staff positions, no backbone. The public MAY interpret this as a decline in the quality of education in Cheshire. The developers and real estate people will have trouble sleeping at night if this a rumor, can you imagine if this was the truth.

The enemy is not the terrorists, the enemy is the the National Education Association and public schools run by kool aid drinking administrators. Due to the increase of both parents forced to work we have allowed the school system to raise our kids and they have taken advantage of that.

Why do we need more reading teachers and aides in our classrooms, what happened to the elementary teachers teaching reading?

The public needs to stand up to this insane piece of wool the education system is pulling over our eyes. Many parents don't want to say anything because they fear retribution from the school on their kids? Why do we allow ourselves to live in fear? I'll tell you why, parents in this town move here for the education, they bought the bad marketing plan. The they think because little Johnny or Karen go to Cheshire this ENTITLES their kids to something special from a college, maybe a full ride and maybe some sort of fleeting fame in the future. Buy the big house with no furniture in it, drive the fancy cars that are leased, make the show and all the time hope the interest rates don't rise. Buy the house on an interest only mortgage and hope you can survive long enough to graduate the kids from a high school that at best is questionable in teaching and learning; and then hope to sell you big house at a price high enough to pay for the principal balance, realtor fees and get out without having to sell you soul.

This is the state of the Town. Our capital spending will double within 5 years due to new school construction and water treatment facilities. To the average homeowner that is an additional $1000 to your taxes, and does not include annual increase based on normal expenditures. So go ahead, allow the Supt his increases, remember only 4% of the school budget actually goes to curriculum, instructional materials and learning items directly that affect the kids. The rest goes to salaries, medical benefits, maintenance and sports. Do your homework people, you are being taken to the cleaners and your enjoying the ride there and back.

Anonymous said...

we need some fiscal conservatives in our government
the congress the last four or five years has gone crazy with reckless spending and earmarks
we need real fiscal conservatives to hold down spending of the congress
who has been in charge in congress and how did they let that happen?
Accountable and affordable
who has been in charge

Anonymous said...

Great commnts on the blog. However how many of the people that write these comments will appear at the public hearings and give their names and make their comments known to all in public.

Anonymous said...

The state of our town is good
We have a record surplus and we have new business coming to town
Our taxes are low and we have good schools and parks
We can do better if the people in Hartford with stop with these mandates and laws that make no sense

Anonymous said...

To Anon 8:36:

You still haven’t answered my question from the other thread:

EXPLAIN JUST HOW PROP 3% IS AN “UNFUNDED MANDATE”??

Elections and referendums are required by the state, but are not considered to be unfunded mandates like no child left behind.

The only cost of Prop 3% will be the cost of a referendum if the council tries to raise taxes by more than 3%... a nominal cost compared to the millions of dollars taxpayers will save.

Stop obfuscating the issue and
Let the People Vote.

Anonymous said...

8:36 says everything is just wunderland, coming up roses. What fantasy world is he living in?

Like "Frightened" pointed out yesterday:

Between the BOE’s net spending increase of 6% annually, the town council’s insistence on fully funding reserves at 8-9%, and the huge influx of new students from the ND... all while we're going into a recession... Cheshire is facing a tidal wave of massive tax increases in the near future. I am truly frightened.

Anonymous said...

The post by “John” above is an insightful analysis of what drives the education bureaucracy, the marketing of Cheshire, and many parents. It deserves careful reading.

From my many years of teaching, I find his observations to be true. I could add more, such as the pervasively disruptive student behavior which administrators ignore, and parents either deny or enable. But that’s a topic for another time.

I’ll say this about the political culture in public schools. It’s like a closed soviet society where thought-conformity is expected. So teachers generally fall into one of three categories:

There are the strict party-line true believers like Mr. Altieri; never a critical thought crosses their minds. There are also those of us who don’t buy the party-line but keep our mouths shut to keep our jobs. Then there’s the 50% of new teachers who quit after 5 years, who just walk away from the classroom chaos and soviet BS.

Folks, wake up. The quality of education has little to do with amounts of money spent. These 5, 6, 7% increases are just good money chasing after bad to feed the insatiable hog which the educational bureaucracy has become.

Anonymous said...

Here is what we should do
Tell Hartford and Washington that we don't want their money and we can do it all ourselves
Let us just pay for everything we want on our own.
We can leave the union of states and leave the state of CT
We would be like the country of Cheshire
nO MANDATES
NO WORRIES
NO STRINGS ATTACHED

Anonymous said...

Matt Altieri (12:10),
you've gone off the deep end.

Anonymous said...

We should vote the budget down until the budget is cut to a 3% or lower increase.

And if it requires cuts in staff, so be it.