Trichloroethyolene (TCE) in Cheshire
After years of inaction at a number of contaminated sites in town, the local health district is preparing to contact property owners about voluntarily remediating their land. (MRJ, by Leslie Hutchison)
Fifteen industrial sites in town are listed on the federal government's potential Superfund list. Six of those sites are under consideration for action by the Environmental Protection Agency....
The former Alling Lander site at 300 E. Johnson Ave. is one of the properties that has lingered on the EPA list for decades. It was designated as a potential Superfund site in 1986 after the agency found the soil and groundwater contaminated with trichloroethyolene, or TCE. According to the EPA, extended exposure to TCE could increase the risk of cancer in humans.
Tim White
3 comments:
Recently I requested some info on one of our lovely superfunds and the epa referred me to the dep since it's in voluntary remediation. I haven't followed up yet, but it's been about a month since I contacted them.
Judging by the epa info on some of our sites like the w. main landfill, there seems to be a lot less transparency when the cleanup is thrown back to the property owners. I'm glad they're footing the bill, but there should still be comparable oversight and public info.
oh, and in case anyone's missed this site (hard to miss when it's on google's page one for Cheshire, CT): http://www.cancerincheshire.com/
...In a June 26, 1994, Cleveland Plain Dealer article entitled Environmentalists Leery of Possible Loopholes, Chris Trepal, co-director of the Earth Day Coalition in Northeast Ohio, lambasted the enabling VAP legislation as "one of the poorest public policy measures I’ve ever seen." A clairvoyant Richard Sahli, executive director of the Ohio Environmental Council, echoed his sentiment in the May 26, 1994, Cincinnati Post, "We do predict there will be a lot of shoddy cleanups under this bill the state will never catch." Testifying before the House Energy & Natural Resources Committee on behalf of the Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers, Cincinnati environmental lawyer David Altman asserted, "This bill is a definite bait-and-switch. What it is supposed to do and what it does is two different things."
A seminal, 152 page 2001 Gund Foundation funded study by the Green Environmental Council confirmed the critics’ predictions. A dearth of agency resources to provide meaningful regulatory oversight combined with the lack of a credible, established enforcement mechanism has rendered the feckless, industry aligned program toothless. "It’s a broken program - it doesn’t work," declared the council’s Bruce Cornett in an interview with the Cleveland Plain Dealer. Both the Sierra Club and Ohio Citizen Action opposed the 2000 $400 million Clean Ohio state bond issue out of concern the fungible proceeds could be utilized to prop up the lame Voluntary Action Program and create a trojan horse polluters slush fund. "This is the governor's attempt to whitewash his EPA," charged Jane Forrest Redfern, environmental projects director for Ohio Citizen Action in a November 1, 2000, Cleveland Plain Dealer article. Dedicated professionals, veteran Ohio EPA bureaucrats attempted to rectify the problem. According to the October 4, 2000, Cleveland Plain Dealer, "EPA staffers who shared some of the environmentalists’ concerns, at one point launched a quiet but unsuccessful campaign to disband the program."
For six years after the Voluntary Action Program’s 1996 implementation, the U.S. EPA refused to extend program participants federal immunity and threatened to decertify the Ohio EPA due to the VAP’s expansive, inhibiting secrecy provisions and tangible lack of transparency. In a brokered, bifurcated modification to the Ohio VAP that "frankly doesn't make sense at all," according to Ohio Public Interest Research Group director Amy Simpson (Akron Beacon Journal, February 24, 2001), an alternative "memorandum of agreement" VAP track with enhanced public access was crafted. Companies that elect the original, opaque, "classic" option, which conceals under an embargo the extent and nature of contamination, will not be afforded U.S. EPA liability insulation. "Why Ohio would want a two-headed monster is beyond me," quipped the Ohio Environmental Council’s Jack Shaner. In SCA’s case, the jaundiced, green and incompliant wants to hide what you can’t see.
Mark Chesler
Oberlin, Ohio
ouch.blog-city.com/
sustainable_community_associates_tainted_titanic_wreck.htm
Post a Comment