09/10 Referenda - $500,000 for CHS infrastructure improvements?
$500,000 for CHS infrastructure improvements?
You can find details of spending on school infrastructure here.
Tim White
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blogging on Cheshire, Connecticut USA To see a particular topic, click on the categories to the left.
Me in Haiti
Interesting sites
- CT Curmudgeon
- CT Capitol Report
- Cheshire Patch
- Tony Perugini Listens
- Underground Town Hall
- Cheshire Herald
- Meriden R-J
- New Haven Register
- CT Mirror
- CT News Junkie
- Politico
- Huffington Post
- Bloomberg News
- Campaign for Liberty
- Rasmussen Reports
- CT Political Reporter
- NYTimes
- CT Sunlight
- Waterbury Rep-Am
- My Left Nutmeg
- Ironman on DC
- Dennis House
- Sarah French
- MRJs community blogs
- Power to the People
- Dowd Muska
- Make Blue Red
- Levers and Pulleys
- Friends of Boulder Knoll
- Courant Capitol Watch
- Shelly Sindland
- Every Day Republican
- CT Energy
- New Haven Independent
- Nick Ragone
2012 candidates
Followers
2009 Candidate websites
Send LTTEs!
- letters@courant.com
- letters@nhregister.com
- letters@record-journal.com
- news@cheshireherald.com
- opinion@rep-am.com
Categories
- taxes n spending (891)
- community (435)
- energy (411)
- recreation (358)
- money (334)
- schools (325)
- town government (266)
- state government (248)
- 2010 election (216)
- Ron Paul (208)
- public works (202)
- environment (195)
- 2008 election (187)
- politics (175)
- federal government (173)
- public safety (173)
- council mtg (165)
- history (155)
- good government (142)
- employees (136)
- northend development (135)
- jobs (124)
- legislators (113)
- truthiness (112)
- Haiti (106)
- 2009 election (102)
- transportation (90)
- foreign affairs (74)
- open forum (70)
- war (69)
- blog (49)
- healthcare (46)
- council video (39)
- housing (37)
- underage drinking (32)
- veterans (29)
- 2007 election (28)
- Iraq (27)
- seniors (26)
- town manager (23)
- 2012 election (20)
- pool (15)
- travel (14)
- Cheshire elections (13)
- 2011 election (7)
- Charter revision (5)
Local websites
Council emails
- tslocum@snet.net
- dsschrumm@cox.net
- tomruocco@snet.net
- aafalvey@cox.net
- timwhite98@yahoo.com
- giddingsanne@yahoo.com
- michaele584@aol.com
Cheshire sports
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1290)
-
▼
September
(82)
- The Turf grant
- The Fed continues opposing transparency
- CYB gets PZC approval for Bartlem Park food stand
- Dear anonymous TH employee...
- These aren't the droids you're looking for...
- The state documents regarding the turf grant
- A recent LTTE of the Herald
- Anne Giddings on the concerns of residents
- Extending the linear trail in Southington
- NHR editorial on Pratt & Whitney plant closing
- Introduction to Tony Perugini (BOE - R)
- There will be two trials
- Ron Paul on auditing the Fed
- Cheshire house party for Sam Caligiuri for Senate
- Website for Tony Perugini (Board of Ed, R)
- Justin Bernier (R, CT-5) introduces himself to the...
- Town mismanagement = no sewer fee?
- Cheshire resident indicted on fraud
- Antivirus Spy 2010 crashed my computer...
- Value of Wii at the reformatory disputed
- The Political Class is losing ground!
- Chief Wiggum chases another suspect...
- Anne Giddings' website
- The downstream impact of turf fields
- Machinists union suing Pratt & Whitney
- Tracking and catching the suspect!
- Mark Davis on the CT Senate race
- NHR on Cheshire's energy stimulus
- Pratt & Whitney leaving Cheshire by early 2011
- Town Council on Fox!
- CT GOP Senate primary: Smackdown!
- 09/10 Referenda - $250,000 for window replacements?
- 2009 / 2010 Concert Series at Elim Park
- Using the turf money on the athletic complex
- 2/3 of House (290 of 435) now support HR 1207
- Pool mold remediation may cost more than $250,000
- A comment on tonight's turf meeting
- Paul and Huffington explain Obama's support of cor...
- Pool meeting: second two (of four) vendor proposals
- Cheshire Plan of Conservation & Development update...
- Pool mold remediation project from Town Hall
- Pool meeting: first two (of four) vendor proposals
- Huffington: Obama captains the S.S. America
- Tim Slocum on the pool - Sept 8, 2009
- 09/10 Referenda - $500,000 for CHS infrastructure ...
- Fire Chief to investigate ongoing software costs
- The availability of Town Hall staff: What's the r...
- Obama's financial regulatory reform won't work
- Pool meetings on Tuesday & Wednesday
- Slocum (Council, at-large) on the PMS & road impro...
- CT politics poll, including the Senate race
- 09/10 Referenda - $450,000 for sewer plant improve...
- The August 12, 2008 PMS discussion and vote
- A review for Craig Houghton's Nutmeg Muse Photography
- Fall Festival postponed until Sunday
- September 11
- Anne Giddings on the campaign and schools
- Ron Paul's HR 1207 - Audit the Fed - will be heard!
- HuffPo exposes the Federal Reserve's practice of c...
- What roads are going to be improved with the $1,00...
- Komisarjevsky wants his trial moved
- Slocum on the campaign - Sept 8, 2009
- Council meeting 9/08
- "He who goes borrowing, goes sorrowing" - Ben Fran...
- Turmelle on the proposed LNG pipeline
- 09/10 Referenda - $1,500,000 for a sewer plant upg...
- The 2009 campaign is kicking into gear
- Cheshire's award-winning spice: Salemme Pepper
- 09/10 Referenda - $1,150,000 on Mixville Pump Stat...
- 09/10 Referenda - $1,000,000 on roads?
- Council meeting agenda - Sept 8, 2009
- 09/10 Referenda - $600,000 for Country Club Road b...
- Energy Commission Sept 3, 2009
- CT offers $100 million tax incentive to UTC
- Does Cheshire leave children behind?
- Hayes wants a separate trial from Komisarjevsky
- Distorting reality: Claiming the GOP would close ...
- Barney Frank speaks to The New Yorker
- Tonight's 09/10 capital budget vote
- Who is more believable: Baghdad Bob or Taxman Tim?
- Increased capacity for the NG pipeline discussed
- HuffPo and Caligiuri seem to agree that Dodd shoul...
-
▼
September
(82)
6 comments:
Is this for the Locker room re-location?What will they do with the existing one?
What exactly will they be doing?
Love these referendums when they ask for this kind of money, but don't really explain the use.
What do residents who don't read this blog do to find out what is going on??
Sounds like something else to vote NO for....
I am voting NO on this one as it is too vague....I believe you need to lock these guys into specific projects....
I agree the question is too vague. This is mostly for relocation of the boys locker room. Supposedly they want to move it down towards the football field.
In the meantime, Cheshire has this $525,000 grant that the turf heads want to use for their turf field.
They ought to redirect the grant to either the locker rooms or better yet, something even more important.
Imagine...the school has reduced the budget by 15 - 18 teaching positions yet some people out there want to spend nearly a million or maybe more on a turf field.
And the boe tries to say that academics are more important than sports??!! Who are they kidding?
Tomorrow night at the BOE meeting the turf is on the agenda. There was a turf meeting at the end of August that nearly no one knew about either. Isn't it nice how they're quietly sneaking this through.
Can someone on the council please ask the important question about use of the $525K grant?
Who makes the final decision on how the town should use this?
Why go to referendum if we already have this sitting and waiting?
Do the turf heads feel they will get all of it?
I will definitely vote no if they decide to move forward with the turf and try to get the town to foot the bill bor a new locker room.
Post a Comment