Last night it was too late to comment on the Solid Waste meeting and the trash hauling discussion. But with the whole issue turning unbelievably political today
(via emails), I really need to begin explaining this.
The result of last night's meeting was fairly simple - the Solid Waste Committee made clear to the Town Manager that he should move forward on issuing a bid for a one year contract. Altieri and Decaprio supported this idea. I strongly opposed it, but tried to keep it simple.
I suggested we issue a bid similar to the one that we issued five years ago:

But I suggested that instead of asking for both
1) hauling & tipping bids and
2) hauling only bidsWe ask for the hauling only bids, but split that into requests for one year and five year offers.
Rather surprising to me, this idea was rejected. I tried to make clear that I wasn't demanding the Town move to automated hauling or demanding the Town enter into a five year contract. I simply wanted
options... same as we had five years ago.
Again though, my suggestion was rejected by Altieri and Decaprio. They insisted that the Town offer a bid that requested
only a one year contract with manual collection.
Altieri, Decaprio and the TM defended their position by talking of their concerns:
1) contract complications
2) recyclable market uncertainties
3) contract uncertainty with a start date for automated collectionThe first two issues are strawmen.
The "contract complications" refer to the fact that since the Town's contract for trash disposal services with CRRA expires in one year... and a new contract with Covanta will replace it... then a five-year trash hauling services contract begun on July 1 2009 would be complicated because it would relate to two trash disposal contracts and will require two contracts. But this is bogus. Either way, the Town will be engaging in two separate contracts... even if the Town executes a one year contract now... we'll still be executing another contract in 12 months.
The "recyclable market uncertainties" is a reality, but it's also a rather hypocritical argument. At other times last night, arguments were made for "budgetary certainty." And there was a great deal of consternation regarding future budgets. But if that's a real concern... one would want a long-term contract for trash hauling services now... right? Of course, that's not the real concern.
The third issue is avoidable by simply eliminating the automated option. Instead, we could simply request two options:
1) manual pickup for one year
2) manual pickup for five years (or some length of time greater than one year)But the other people at the meeting were vehemently opposed to anything other than issuing a bid for manual pickup for one year. And the conversation even harkened back to the Council meeting when Altieri requested a bid waiver... noting most Council members seemed to be calling for bidding the contract for one year. And that's fair enough. But then why have the Solid Waste Committee discuss it further? And why does Chairman Altieri refuse to entertain new ideas? He seems to oppose anything that wasn't discussed at the Feb 10 Council meeting. That's leadership for ya - working in an open-minded, collaborative style.
Speaking only for myself obviously... subsequent to the February 10 meeting and upon further consideration... I concluded that requesting other bid offers made sense. It's basically what we did five years ago. So why not do it now?
But the Solid Waste Chair would have none of it. He insisted on moving forward with a request for only a one year manual collection. And that's what staff intends to do.
There's a problem with a one year contract though. It's entirely possible that without several years to amortize the capital costs for equipment... one would have to absorb all those costs during one year... driving up the cost of the one year contract.
So I think it's fair to expect that bids for a one year contract will be higher than if we requested bids for five years.
My question: Why not issue a bid for multi-year contracts?Sure they claim that there are "unknowns" with the recyclable markets. But then their presumption must be that the recyclable market will rebound next year. And if that's the case, are these same people asserting that the economy will recover next year? Seems doubtful to me that the recyclables market will recover next year, if the economy hasn't recovered.
I have to wonder if there are any unspoken reasons for why the Solid Waste Committee refuses to issue a bid that requests multi-year service contracts.
One last note... at the meeting I again took
partial blame for not having acted sooner on this. I didn't hear anyone else say anything of that nature though - shocker.
Tim White